Naoko Sawamatsu vs Ai Sugiyama Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L W L W
Form
L L W L L W L L L LH2H: Sawamatsu 1 - 1 Sugiyama
They have played 8 sets in total, with Sawamatsu winning 6 and Sugiyama winning 2. The last match between Sawamatsu and Sugiyama was at the Pilot Pen International - Atlanta, Georgia, 18-08-1997, First, Hard with Naoko Sawamatsu getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 1 |
| Ai Sugiyama | 1 |
Pilot Pen International - Atlanta, Georgia(18-08-1997)
7
6
6
4
| Sawamatsu | Stats | Sugiyama |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 14 | Highest Rank | 8 |
| 52 | Age | 49 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 7 |
| 59% (206-145) | Career Total W/L | 54% (494-421) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,079,150 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 41 | Games Won | 32 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naoko Sawamatsu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ai Sugiyama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Ai Sugiyama
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samantha Stosur
Player
Ai Sugiyama
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
54 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Mauresmo
Player
Ai Sugiyama
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Dementieva
Player
Ai Sugiyama
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ai Sugiyama
Player
Iveta Benesova
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Ai Sugiyama
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Ai Sugiyama
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ai Sugiyama
Player
Carly Gullickson
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Ai Sugiyama
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniela Hantuchova
Player
Ai Sugiyama
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (206/145) | Win/Loss | 54% (494/421) |
| 56% (461/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1130/1002) |
| 52% (3914/3569) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (10151/9631) |
| 60% (104/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (284/210) |
| 56% (39/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (65/79) |
| 59% (23/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (86/80) |
| 44% (7/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (43/39) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 204 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 925 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 1.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 357.76 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 64% (8797/13689) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5296/8780) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2165/4932) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (801/1768) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6409/14046) |
| 50% (22/22) | Slam W/L | 57% (79/59) |
| 44% (7/9) | Masters W/L | 52% (87/79) |
| 40% (8/12) | Cups W/L | 27% (6/16) |
| 53% (23/20) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (214/182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 87% (13/2) | Challenger W/L | 63% (34/20) |
| 63% (31/18) | Futures W/L | 55% (16/13) |
| 59% (204/347) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (486/901) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (87/175) |
| 59% (73/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (162/306) |
| 88% (187/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (490/412) |
| 12% (187/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (490/76) |
| 25% (163/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (423/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
